Milton Steinberg's theological legacy, particularly his complex relationship with Reconstructionist Judaism, has been mischaracterized through problematic editorial decisions in "Anatomy of Faith." Drawing upon decades of close personal and professional connection with Steinberg, this analysis challenges Arthur A. Cohen's biographical interpretation and reconstruction of Steinberg's final lectures. Through textual criticism and firsthand testimony, significant discrepancies emerge in Cohen's editorial work, especially regarding attributed statements about Mordecai Kaplan's theology. Despite Cohen's implications of an ideological rupture, evidence shows Steinberg maintained consistent alignment with fundamental Reconstructionist principles throughout his career, diverging only on specific theological questions about God's nature rather than core philosophical orientation. Steinberg's theological framework embraced bi-polarity in religious thought, carefully balancing reason with faith, transcendence with immanence, and divine sovereignty with human freedom. This examination not only illuminates Steinberg's intellectual development and his steadfast commitment to rational faith within Jewish theological discourse but also underscores the inherent challenges in posthumous editorial reconstruction of philosophical works.