Conservative Judaism's seemingly contradictory approaches to kashrut observance stem from two distinct philosophical frameworks within the movement, challenging critics who point to inconsistent practices as evidence of theological weakness. Through systematic examination of Conservative theological principles, this analysis reveals how one framework treats halakha as "the halakha"—a complete, binding legal system—while the other views it as "a halakha," preserving core principles while allowing flexibility in details. Despite these differences, both approaches maintain three essential kashrut requirements: prohibition of certain creatures, proper ritual slaughter with blood removal, and separation of meat and dairy products. The methodology encompasses analysis of Conservative theological principles and their practical applications across communities. Rather than undermining halakhic authority, these dual interpretive approaches demonstrate how Conservative Judaism sustains fundamental commitments to divine commandment and unified Jewish observance while accommodating diverse practices. This theoretical framework explains variation within Conservative kashrut observance as legitimate expressions of Jewish religious law, supporting movement cohesion despite apparent contradictions.